29
Aug

PUTIN CHARGES: BUSHEVIKS PROVOKED GEORGIA WAR FOR US ELECTION

PUTIN: US BEHIND GEORGIAN WAR FOR DOMESTC POLITICAL REASONS

Yesterday, I mused about the possibility of an “October surprise” because of the war in Georgia, a way of making national security the key issue in the campaign, an issue that McCain can exploit. Apparently I am not the only one thinking this way.

Today, (Thurs) there was this bombshell:

CNN EXCLISIVE: Putin: U.S. orchestrated Georgian war

SOCHI, Russia (CNN) — Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has accused the United States of orchestrating the conflict in Georgia to benefit one of its presidential election candidates.

In an exclusive interview with CNN’s Matthew Chance in the Black Sea city of Sochi Thursday, Putin said the U.S. had encouraged Georgia to attack the autonomous region of South Ossetia.

[SNIP]

“U.S. citizens were indeed in the area in conflict,” Putin said. “They were acting in implementing those orders doing as they were ordered, and the only one who can give such orders is their leader.”

LONDON BASED JOURNALIST WILLIAM BOWLES COMMENTS;

It’s obvious that the Georgian provocation instigated by the US, is part of a larger and even more ominous scheme of destabilization, but the issue here is more complex than ‘grand schemes of world domination’ because I contend that the real world of the collapsing capitalist economies is now dictating events (which makes the situation even more dangerous for all of us).

First of all, Russia is in the way of the US move Eastward, which is where Georgia plays a vital role, hence the need to get Georgia into NATO. However, as with many of the US’s previous ‘allies’, Saakashvili has proved to be totally unreliable (if not mentally unbalanced), and if as seems more than likely, the US ‘advised’ him to invade Ossetia, it has proved to be yet another strategic blunder, or did the US assume that the Russians would roll over and play dead?

Either way, under the circumstances the ‘Cold War’ card was all that was left to the West, but bluffing is all well and good when playing poker but not when the game is chess.

THOMAS GOLTZ, the author of Georgia Diary sees a more complicated situation:

By August 11, Georgia had in effect capitulated, and was begging for international diplomatic intervention. Russian tanks ruled the land, Russian aviation ruled the skies and Russian naval craft ruled the shores of the Black Sea. And Russian propaganda largely ruled the airwaves, too. That last victory might be summed up by the way the short war is usually represented even in the western media: namely, that the Russian counter-attack had been massively successful, and the man to blame for the mess was not Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin (and certainly not Russian President Dmitry Medvedev) but the mercurial Georgian President, Mikheil (Misha) Saakashvili.

Not.

A ‘counter attack’ assumes an initial attack, and the Georgians, while perhaps guilty of being lured into a trap, never attacked Russia. Rather, in the days prior to 8.8.8, Georgia had been responding to an escalating series of provocations inside South Ossetia and to a lesser extent in Abkhazia. That is how the war began, and how it should be remembered: it was and is a war of provocation followed by creeping annexation, and planned and executed with a surprising degree of efficiency, and complete audacity.

This was no where more in evidence than the decision by the Upper House of the Russian Duma on August 25th to recommend the recognition of both South Ossetia and Abkhazia as independent states, IE, to tear these territories away from Georgia, and forever. The parliamentary decision was next passed by the Lower House and then signed by President Medvedev within 24 hours of its initial getting tabled, to the joy of the Ossetians and Abkhaz, the shock and anguish of Georgia and the baffled (and, after the recognition by the west of breakaway Kosovo last year, hypocritical) cries of ‘foul play!’ in western capitals. A bed-rock of the international system of relations between countries in place since 1945, namely, the inviolability of the territorial integrity of existing states, had just been removed, and Pandora’s Box opened.

2 Responses to “PUTIN CHARGES: BUSHEVIKS PROVOKED GEORGIA WAR FOR US ELECTION”

  1. 1
    Darryl Bowles Says:

    I agree 100% with my namesake but not relative Bill Bowles. The GOP seems most willing to risk Nuclear war to get McCain elected. Ask why the USS Mount Whitney, the command ship of the US Sixth fleet has been commanded to the Black Sea. And why Cindy McCain just happened to be there when this decision was made. (More at my blog.)

  2. 2
    Olga Flowers Says:

    I disagree that Russia set up a trap for Georgia to attack.

    First of all, Russia has repeatedly stated that the West was wrong in installing missile bases in Eastern Europe - too close to Russia. Does anybody remember that back in the early 60’s, President Kennedy sent an embargo against Cuba because Cuba was in the process of installing a missile base just 90 miles from US shores?

    Isn’t it an act of aggression for the US to establish bases near Russia? What is the purpose, other than US imperialism?

    Both the US and Israel have been arming and training Georgians over the last few years.

    The Cold War doesn’t exist. Russia has been doing extremely well during the last several years. Their standard of living has increased. And they have oil and gas.

    Russia has done well with its neighbors. In fact, it was Russia alone that publicly sided with Yugoslavia against the stealing of Kosovo by radical Albanians. Kosovo was part of Serbia for many centuries. How dare Bush and western Europe support such a travesty. Who really is imperialistic?

    Unfortunately, the Bush regime wants to take on the whole world. They blew a great chance at peace. They don’t want peace and prosperity. The Bush regime needs war and chaos in order to take control of the globe.

    The Russian/Georgian conflict is more about the west’s imperialism.

    Olga

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image

Recent Comments

    Game Over. I have reluctantly disabled the comments on my blog because a small number of self-indulgent spammers and neer do wells with nothing to say about any of the issues I raise or report on, have stepped up the volume of their sniping and SPA's--Stupid personal attacks. I am sure readers find them as offensive and adolescent as I do. All hide behind anonymous emails and never really want replies or a dialogue. Snarky is one thing; insults another.

    Your comments are welcome and I am happy to post them in the blog. Share comments, questions and criticisms by emailing me here.

    Thank you for understanding.

Archives


Books I Like


Purchases help
support this blog!

  • Censored 2005: The Top 25 Censored Stories (Censored)
    Censored 2005: The Top 25 Censored Stories (Censored)
    Author: Project Censored
    Rating: 0

My Movies


IN DEBT WE TRUST
Why are so many Americans are being strangled by debt? In Debt We Trust is a journalistic confrontation with the debt and credit industry.

WMD
Weapons of Mass Deception (WMD) goes inside the military-media complex, exposing the war the world saw but Americans didn't.

MediaChannel Store



Plunder: Investigating Our Economic Calamity


Plunder: Investigating Our Economic Calamity

By Danny Schechter
As millions of homes are foreclosed upon, as unemployment grows and inflation mounts, it is time to understand the origins of the crisis and the need to fight for economic justice.

Click here to buy it! >>


Home Sweet Home Project


Home Sweet Home Project

Shock Jocks:
Hate Speech and
Talk Radio

Shock Jocks: Hate Speech and Talk Radio

Written by veteran media critic and Emmy winner Rory O'Connor, Shock Jocks features unsparing profiles of the ten worst conservative radio talkers in America, including Michael Savage, Bill O' Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Don Imus and the rest.

Click here to buy it! >>



Soundbyte

"Curtailment of free speech is rationalized on grounds that a more compelling American tradition forbids criticism of the government when the nation is at war...Nothing can be more destructive of our fundamental democratic traditions than the vicious effort to silence dissenters."
—Martin Luther King, Jr.

Indymedia.us

Member of Media Bloggers Association
  • Media Bloggers

  • Media Columnists

  • News and Commentary