<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.9" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REPORT: BUSH TO ATTACK IRAN, RETRACTED, BURIED</title>
	<link>http://www.newsdissector.com/blog/2008/05/20/report-bush-to-attack-iran-retracted-buried/</link>
	<description>Danny Schechter's daily media dissections</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.9</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Tenor</title>
		<link>http://www.newsdissector.com/blog/2008/05/20/report-bush-to-attack-iran-retracted-buried/#comment-33425</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 17:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.newsdissector.com/blog/2008/05/20/report-bush-to-attack-iran-retracted-buried/#comment-33425</guid>
					<description>p.s.

I've always been opposed to H.Clinton running for President.  If she cared one whit for our nation, she would not have run.  Even blinded by ambition, she must  know our 'democratic' (imperial) 'republic' should not be dominated by two families successively for so long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>p.s.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always been opposed to H.Clinton running for President.  If she cared one whit for our nation, she would not have run.  Even blinded by ambition, she must  know our &#8216;democratic&#8217; (imperial) &#8216;republic&#8217; should not be dominated by two families successively for so long.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tenor</title>
		<link>http://www.newsdissector.com/blog/2008/05/20/report-bush-to-attack-iran-retracted-buried/#comment-33422</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 16:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.newsdissector.com/blog/2008/05/20/report-bush-to-attack-iran-retracted-buried/#comment-33422</guid>
					<description>I was a Goldwater girl in high school [one of two in my H.S. on L.I.], and a Young Republican in college in 1965-1966, Washington, D.C.  As one of three members of the "Conservative Club" or the Young Repubs (a liberal GOP bunch favoring the Rockefeller wing), I had to quite the CC because the geekly pimply boy finally disclosed his attraction for Nazi emblems.  (Later, by the way, Jack became the leader of the campus SDS, one of the first Gay Priders and active with a national anti-war organization).

My complete and utter rejection of the GOP occurred at a GOP dinner at a fancy DC hotel (they didn't have many Young Republicans in 1966 so we always got a nice meals and tables at the back of the banquet halls).  The speaker was Tricky Dick on the comeback trail.  He was launching his presidential bid.

Too bad I don't remember what he said.  I do remember gripping the table and working hard to keep from screaming and running out in the middle of it.  By that time in my political education, whatever he said was completely and nauseatingly repellent to me.  My roommate and I ran out of the hotel.  Outside, we hugged each other and swore we would never have any association with the GOP again!  We got busted together at the Pentagon in 1967.

In short, who knows whether her conversion was genuine or not.  Huge changes swept the young into radical change in all of spheres of their beliefs and activities.  That's why they call it The SIXTIES.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a Goldwater girl in high school [one of two in my H.S. on L.I.], and a Young Republican in college in 1965-1966, Washington, D.C.  As one of three members of the &#8220;Conservative Club&#8221; or the Young Repubs (a liberal GOP bunch favoring the Rockefeller wing), I had to quite the CC because the geekly pimply boy finally disclosed his attraction for Nazi emblems.  (Later, by the way, Jack became the leader of the campus SDS, one of the first Gay Priders and active with a national anti-war organization).</p>
<p>My complete and utter rejection of the GOP occurred at a GOP dinner at a fancy DC hotel (they didn&#8217;t have many Young Republicans in 1966 so we always got a nice meals and tables at the back of the banquet halls).  The speaker was Tricky Dick on the comeback trail.  He was launching his presidential bid.</p>
<p>Too bad I don&#8217;t remember what he said.  I do remember gripping the table and working hard to keep from screaming and running out in the middle of it.  By that time in my political education, whatever he said was completely and nauseatingly repellent to me.  My roommate and I ran out of the hotel.  Outside, we hugged each other and swore we would never have any association with the GOP again!  We got busted together at the Pentagon in 1967.</p>
<p>In short, who knows whether her conversion was genuine or not.  Huge changes swept the young into radical change in all of spheres of their beliefs and activities.  That&#8217;s why they call it The SIXTIES.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: NABNYC</title>
		<link>http://www.newsdissector.com/blog/2008/05/20/report-bush-to-attack-iran-retracted-buried/#comment-33196</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 02:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.newsdissector.com/blog/2008/05/20/report-bush-to-attack-iran-retracted-buried/#comment-33196</guid>
					<description>Hillary Clinton is a Goldwater girl, a Republican.  Why can't her supporters see that.  Or do they?  I'm betting Rupert Murdoch and Richard Mellon Sciafe see it.  Karl Rove, Pat Buchanan.  The fat dude on the radio.  

What are the chances an attack on Iran will take place this summer, before the Democratic convention?  That would be yet another straw in Hillary's bonfire to use to threaten to incinerate the Democratic Party.  She could easily be coordinating this with her good friends in the Bush Regime to ensure her nomination and eventual election.

Here's another thought.  Hillary comes from a Republican family and was a huge Goldwater fan.  Goldwater was considered the far right-wing of the Republican party.  Yet with no explanation whatsoever, Hillary does a 180 and goes way out to the Communist/Hippie/Drug-Loving Promiscuous Youth center in San Francisco to volunteer one summer to defend Black Panthers.  Coincidentally, or not, Hillary's few months spent getting information about the Black Panthers was at the exact same time that Janet Elmira Hoover in his pink taffetta and corset was running cointelpro, a federal government undercover program designed to murder, frame, or imprison every member of the black panther party.  

And remember when Hillary was in the white house and started collecting FBI files?  I wonder if she started with her own?  Which side was she on?

Why did Hillary promise to annihilate Iran?  It wasn't the necessary answer to a tough question -- she volunteered it.  Why?  Pundits say it was to get pro-Israel votes in Pennsylvania.  Or was that the price Richard Mellon Sciafe exacted in exchange for his support down the road? 

Hillary is not going to leave the campaign.  She will go to the convention.  If she can't steal the nomination, she and her bag-man hubby have lined up hundreds of millions of dollars that will be offered to the party if they give her the nod.  The party will be told they get nothing if Obama is the man.  And the Gulf of Iran, the sequel to the Gulf of Tonkin, might be staged to help her tip the scales.

Then what for progressives?  Dorian Gray, the Manchurian Candidate on the one hand, or Medea, Lizzy Borden, Mad Mable on the other?

Oh well.  I always say that when the politics part isn't going too well, at least we can take comfort from the fact that we've got a strong economy and a bright financial future.  Or at least China does.  

Just think, soon schoolchildren all over China will have to listen to their mothers telling them to clean their plates and "think of the poor starving children in the U.S."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary Clinton is a Goldwater girl, a Republican.  Why can&#8217;t her supporters see that.  Or do they?  I&#8217;m betting Rupert Murdoch and Richard Mellon Sciafe see it.  Karl Rove, Pat Buchanan.  The fat dude on the radio.  </p>
<p>What are the chances an attack on Iran will take place this summer, before the Democratic convention?  That would be yet another straw in Hillary&#8217;s bonfire to use to threaten to incinerate the Democratic Party.  She could easily be coordinating this with her good friends in the Bush Regime to ensure her nomination and eventual election.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another thought.  Hillary comes from a Republican family and was a huge Goldwater fan.  Goldwater was considered the far right-wing of the Republican party.  Yet with no explanation whatsoever, Hillary does a 180 and goes way out to the Communist/Hippie/Drug-Loving Promiscuous Youth center in San Francisco to volunteer one summer to defend Black Panthers.  Coincidentally, or not, Hillary&#8217;s few months spent getting information about the Black Panthers was at the exact same time that Janet Elmira Hoover in his pink taffetta and corset was running cointelpro, a federal government undercover program designed to murder, frame, or imprison every member of the black panther party.  </p>
<p>And remember when Hillary was in the white house and started collecting FBI files?  I wonder if she started with her own?  Which side was she on?</p>
<p>Why did Hillary promise to annihilate Iran?  It wasn&#8217;t the necessary answer to a tough question &#8212; she volunteered it.  Why?  Pundits say it was to get pro-Israel votes in Pennsylvania.  Or was that the price Richard Mellon Sciafe exacted in exchange for his support down the road? </p>
<p>Hillary is not going to leave the campaign.  She will go to the convention.  If she can&#8217;t steal the nomination, she and her bag-man hubby have lined up hundreds of millions of dollars that will be offered to the party if they give her the nod.  The party will be told they get nothing if Obama is the man.  And the Gulf of Iran, the sequel to the Gulf of Tonkin, might be staged to help her tip the scales.</p>
<p>Then what for progressives?  Dorian Gray, the Manchurian Candidate on the one hand, or Medea, Lizzy Borden, Mad Mable on the other?</p>
<p>Oh well.  I always say that when the politics part isn&#8217;t going too well, at least we can take comfort from the fact that we&#8217;ve got a strong economy and a bright financial future.  Or at least China does.  </p>
<p>Just think, soon schoolchildren all over China will have to listen to their mothers telling them to clean their plates and &#8220;think of the poor starving children in the U.S.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jack Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.newsdissector.com/blog/2008/05/20/report-bush-to-attack-iran-retracted-buried/#comment-33169</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.newsdissector.com/blog/2008/05/20/report-bush-to-attack-iran-retracted-buried/#comment-33169</guid>
					<description>Potential attack on Iran. Interesting. The timing for that, I would expect, would immediately follow US elections in Nov. Gives a ten or twelve week window for shock and awe with a lame duck Congress likely unwilling to do anything about it until after new members are seated and sworn in. Big advantage to the administration this way, and the Dems have been appeasing the Republicans for several years now, so they all should be good to go. I don't see any opposition to an invasion coming from outgoing Republicans, especially if there is a major shift in seats in Congress. And if there is significant resistance from Iran, then the administration can invoke the new continuity of government orders and effectively cancel the election while they are at it. 
Now, if only the Iranians would co-operate and give us an incident...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Potential attack on Iran. Interesting. The timing for that, I would expect, would immediately follow US elections in Nov. Gives a ten or twelve week window for shock and awe with a lame duck Congress likely unwilling to do anything about it until after new members are seated and sworn in. Big advantage to the administration this way, and the Dems have been appeasing the Republicans for several years now, so they all should be good to go. I don&#8217;t see any opposition to an invasion coming from outgoing Republicans, especially if there is a major shift in seats in Congress. And if there is significant resistance from Iran, then the administration can invoke the new continuity of government orders and effectively cancel the election while they are at it.<br />
Now, if only the Iranians would co-operate and give us an incident&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: paulrkesselman</title>
		<link>http://www.newsdissector.com/blog/2008/05/20/report-bush-to-attack-iran-retracted-buried/#comment-33136</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 05:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.newsdissector.com/blog/2008/05/20/report-bush-to-attack-iran-retracted-buried/#comment-33136</guid>
					<description>take a look @ http://www.israeltoday.co.il/default.aspx?tabid=178&#38;nid=16043</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>take a look @ <a href="http://www.israeltoday.co.il/default.aspx?tabid=178&amp;nid=16043" rel="nofollow">http://www.israeltoday.co.il/default.aspx?tabid=178&amp;nid=16043</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
