<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.9" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NEW LOBBY CRITICAL OF ISRAEL FORMED; $10 A GALLON GAS FEARED</title>
	<link>http://www.newsdissector.com/blog/2008/04/29/new-lobby-critical-of-israel-formed-10-a-gallon-gas-feared/</link>
	<description>Danny Schechter's daily media dissections</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 05:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.9</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Recon3</title>
		<link>http://www.newsdissector.com/blog/2008/04/29/new-lobby-critical-of-israel-formed-10-a-gallon-gas-feared/#comment-31252</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.newsdissector.com/blog/2008/04/29/new-lobby-critical-of-israel-formed-10-a-gallon-gas-feared/#comment-31252</guid>
					<description>Hillary Clinton's absurd statement a week ago is a strong indication that she's at the very least rash and impulsive, at the worst, an insane maniac, and therefore unsuitable for the position of POTUS! 

There's no legitimate reason why any candidate, whether Clinton or McCain, et al, should have need to resort to the ULTIMATE THREAT in order to garner additional votes. Is she, and they, that desperate for such votes, that she/they need to pander to the lowest common denominator?

Due to the complexity of issues, both foreign and domestic, that a POTUS is expected to deal with 24/7, those candidates who for that office should be required, by law, to submit to the most intense, thorough investigation of their background. This should include every candidate to submit a 200 page resume listing their reasons for wanting to be POTUS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary Clinton&#8217;s absurd statement a week ago is a strong indication that she&#8217;s at the very least rash and impulsive, at the worst, an insane maniac, and therefore unsuitable for the position of POTUS! </p>
<p>There&#8217;s no legitimate reason why any candidate, whether Clinton or McCain, et al, should have need to resort to the ULTIMATE THREAT in order to garner additional votes. Is she, and they, that desperate for such votes, that she/they need to pander to the lowest common denominator?</p>
<p>Due to the complexity of issues, both foreign and domestic, that a POTUS is expected to deal with 24/7, those candidates who for that office should be required, by law, to submit to the most intense, thorough investigation of their background. This should include every candidate to submit a 200 page resume listing their reasons for wanting to be POTUS.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Allene Swienckowski</title>
		<link>http://www.newsdissector.com/blog/2008/04/29/new-lobby-critical-of-israel-formed-10-a-gallon-gas-feared/#comment-31220</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.newsdissector.com/blog/2008/04/29/new-lobby-critical-of-israel-formed-10-a-gallon-gas-feared/#comment-31220</guid>
					<description>Hillary's "obliterating Iran" statement last week was just plain stupid! Clinton's feminist supporters only hear that she's talking "tough" and believe that she's proving she has what it takes to get that mythical 3:00 AM call and respond in the same way any male president would. Is that what feminists have been fighting for all of these years; to act and think just like the guys? 
When will women wake-up and realize that you don't have to act tough to solve problems? We've taken a fast track train back to the days of the cave - only might wins and diplomacy is not an option. And in a way, our world is quickly devolving into an uncivilized, chaotic wasteland.
I have only one question for all of the people who support Hillary - what happened to the woman who spoke of a "right-wing conspiracy" against her husband and why has she joined forces with them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary&#8217;s &#8220;obliterating Iran&#8221; statement last week was just plain stupid! Clinton&#8217;s feminist supporters only hear that she&#8217;s talking &#8220;tough&#8221; and believe that she&#8217;s proving she has what it takes to get that mythical 3:00 AM call and respond in the same way any male president would. Is that what feminists have been fighting for all of these years; to act and think just like the guys?<br />
When will women wake-up and realize that you don&#8217;t have to act tough to solve problems? We&#8217;ve taken a fast track train back to the days of the cave - only might wins and diplomacy is not an option. And in a way, our world is quickly devolving into an uncivilized, chaotic wasteland.<br />
I have only one question for all of the people who support Hillary - what happened to the woman who spoke of a &#8220;right-wing conspiracy&#8221; against her husband and why has she joined forces with them?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
