20
Jun

Wuz Tom Hayden Robbed — By Hostile Media Coverage?

I have known Tom Hayden for years from our days together in the civil rights and student movements. He made a decision some years ago to enter electoral politics, running unsucessfully for the U.S. Senate from California, and later winning a place in the State legislature where he was respected as a pioneer of progressive legislation. When he left Sacramento, he made a failed bid for the Mayor’s job in LA. He lost. And just this year, he ran for the LA City Council from the liberal leaning West Side of Los Angeles and was given a good chance of winning. But he lost, and in a Florida-like squeaker by just 369 votes!

According to Walter Lippmann, a local writer, that loss can be blamed on negative media coverage in the Los Angles Times which, he charges, practiced a a form of modern red baiting and labeling. Perhaps other Angelinos can weigh in on this. Lippmann sent me a letter he wrote the Times. I am not sure if it has been published or not.

Editor, Los Angeles Times

(A response to the assessment of Tom Hayden’s campaign, June 16)

Why is the TIMES re-burying the 1960s again?

Tom Hayden was no icon to me. His pandering to the worst fears and prejudices, especially regarding Israel’s wars, were obvious. But the Times objects to the GOOD he did: opposing the Vietnam war and acting for civil rights. Consider:

Given the tiny 369 vote margin out of 53,167 cast (.0069%) the Times was THE deciding factor in Hayden’s loss. Had the Times not campaignedagainst Hayden, he would have been elected.

Your coverage was filled with loaded words such as: “traitor”, “stumbled”, “goateed liberal icon”, “carousel of political baggage”, “aging insurgent”, “burned out”, “jaded”, “skulked” and “old, worn and out of touch”.

The Times’ goal was obvious: to trash the movements of the 1960s and their hopes for a less violent, less greedy, more humane world. That will not succeed.

Sincerely (and for publication),
Walter Lippmann

Over 30 years of reading the LA TimesPaid print subscriber
p.s., I am ready, willing and able to writean op-ed column expanding on this.

Thanks.

Comments are closed.

Recent Comments

    Game Over. I have reluctantly disabled the comments on my blog because a small number of self-indulgent spammers and neer do wells with nothing to say about any of the issues I raise or report on, have stepped up the volume of their sniping and SPA's--Stupid personal attacks. I am sure readers find them as offensive and adolescent as I do. All hide behind anonymous emails and never really want replies or a dialogue. Snarky is one thing; insults another.

    Your comments are welcome and I am happy to post them in the blog. Share comments, questions and criticisms by emailing me here.

    Thank you for understanding.

Archives


Books I Like


Purchases help
support this blog!

  • Censored 2005: The Top 25 Censored Stories (Censored)
    Censored 2005: The Top 25 Censored Stories (Censored)
    Author: Project Censored
    Rating: 0

My Movies


IN DEBT WE TRUST
Why are so many Americans are being strangled by debt? In Debt We Trust is a journalistic confrontation with the debt and credit industry.

WMD
Weapons of Mass Deception (WMD) goes inside the military-media complex, exposing the war the world saw but Americans didn't.

MediaChannel Store



Plunder: Investigating Our Economic Calamity


Plunder: Investigating Our Economic Calamity

By Danny Schechter
As millions of homes are foreclosed upon, as unemployment grows and inflation mounts, it is time to understand the origins of the crisis and the need to fight for economic justice.

Click here to buy it! >>


Home Sweet Home Project


Home Sweet Home Project

Shock Jocks:
Hate Speech and
Talk Radio

Shock Jocks: Hate Speech and Talk Radio

Written by veteran media critic and Emmy winner Rory O'Connor, Shock Jocks features unsparing profiles of the ten worst conservative radio talkers in America, including Michael Savage, Bill O' Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Don Imus and the rest.

Click here to buy it! >>



Soundbyte

"Curtailment of free speech is rationalized on grounds that a more compelling American tradition forbids criticism of the government when the nation is at war...Nothing can be more destructive of our fundamental democratic traditions than the vicious effort to silence dissenters."
—Martin Luther King, Jr.

Indymedia.us

Member of Media Bloggers Association
  • Media Bloggers

  • Media Columnists

  • News and Commentary